http://trentrichardson.com/2009/12/28/should-odbc-classes-have-a-syntax-layer/ practical web design & development Fri, 18 May 2012 18:53:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://trentrichardson.com/2009/12/28/should-odbc-classes-have-a-syntax-layer/comment-page-1/#comment-14196 trent Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:14:50 +0000 http://trentrichardson.com/?p=438#comment-14196 Thats a good point, it could also be useful for version specific differences even for regular mysql or mssql connections, even when not using odbc Thats a good point, it could also be useful for version specific differences even for regular mysql or mssql connections, even when not using odbc

]]> http://trentrichardson.com/2009/12/28/should-odbc-classes-have-a-syntax-layer/comment-page-1/#comment-14191 jay Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:04:14 +0000 http://trentrichardson.com/?p=438#comment-14191 this approach might also be useful for different version db, sql server 2008 may have some features not available for sql server 2000, and those workarounds could be available through the syntax layer. this approach might also be useful for different version db, sql server 2008 may have some features not available for sql server 2000, and those workarounds could be available through the syntax layer.

]]>